Disagree, disagree, disagree. Don’t see any logic to that. On 23 Dec 2015, at 02:10, Andrey Tarantsov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can't help commenting... > >> I can only see subjective “dislike this”. > > The feel of the language is very important. We're talking about improving the > syntax to look better here, so of course the subjective look of it matters > most. > >> Using “func” or “lambda” outside is uglier than “in” inside the braes? >> Really? > > A thousand times yes. "in" is unfortunate, but adding a keyword would be... > backwards doesn't quite capture it. It would destroy a big portion of the fun > of the entire language. > >> And closures are really *not* control flow statements, so treating like them >> is just a fallacy and source of confusion. > > ...but it looks and reads very good. ;-) > > > The only thing that I find wrong is "in". It just doesn't look delimited > enough. foo.map { bar in bar.boz} is heavy on the eyes, while foo.map { |bar| > bar.boz } would be ideal. > > A man can dream, right? > > Honestly, I think I understand the tradeoffs involved, so I'm fine with > letting that "in" be. > > A. >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
