> On Dec 21, 2015, at 19:47 , Kevin Ballard via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > On another note, I'm tempted to say that we should use $start and $end > instead of $.start and $.end. The compiler doesn't currently allow this, > because it expects a number after the $, but I see no reason why we can't > relax that rule and allow $start to be a valid token. The benefit of this > approach is it frees up $ to be used by third-party code (such as in the > older thread about rebinding `self` for DSLs where I suggested that a > block-based API can use $ as the parameter name so code would say something > like `$.expect(foo).to(.equal(bar))`).
Without commenting on the rest of this thread, the current rule is that identifiers starting with "$" are reserved for the debugger (not counting implicit closure args). We can change that rule, but the debugger folks won't be happy—the implicit variables you get from the REPL, for example, should stay short. I'm not sure if '$' itself falls under the current rule, though. Jordan _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
