We should get this as a proposal in. That case so it doesn't slip off the radar if that is the case
Sent from my iPhone > On 23 Dec 2015, at 19:57, Stephen Celis <[email protected]> wrote: > > I remember reading another thread (the associated/typealias renaming > discussion) where an Apple engineer wrote that this limitation is temporary > and that functions should be definable directly in a protocol. If that's the > case, this may just be a bug and not have to go through evolution. > > Stephen > >> On Dec 23, 2015, at 2:54 PM, James Campbell via swift-evolution >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Mixins would be a great addition instead of having to define a protocol and >> then extending it >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
