Sent from my iPad
> On Dec 24, 2015, at 5:46 AM, Thorsten Seitz <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Am 22.12.2015 um 18:30 schrieb Matthew Johnson <[email protected]>: >> >> My proposal is specifically suggesting that we treat “initial value” as a >> default rather than an initialization that always happens. IMO the current >> behavior is limiting and problematic in a number of ways. >> >> If we make the change I am suggesting double initialization / assignment >> will not happen. > > Ah, ok! > > I'm a bit uneasy about overloading the initial-value-syntax with a new > meaning, though. > > -Thorsten This was pulled from the latest draft of the proposal. Please take a look at the current draft and let me know if you like the new solution better. Matthew _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
