That looks exactly what I was thinking of, thanks! On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 8:36 PM Javier Soto <[email protected]> wrote:
> I believe what you're looking for is here under "complete generics" > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/README.md > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 8:23 AM Sash Zats <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That would be great! Is there a comprehensive list of features that made >> it under the cut? >> All I'm finding points to swift-evolution repo and API design guidelines. >> >> On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 8:09 AM Javier Soto <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> If I understood your proposal correctly, this is already planned to be >>> possible in Swift 3 :) >>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 9:05 PM Sash Zats via swift-evolution < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> I ran into several cases when it would be desirable to add an >>>> inheritance clause B in the protocol extension A. Briefly, my proposal is >>>> that compiler should not produce an error once `extension A: B` implements >>>> all the functions of the protocol B, making it formally confirming to it. >>>> Sadly, currently, there is no elegant way to mark the conformance formally. >>>> A more detailed draft can be found here >>>> https://gist.github.com/zats/52476a83627f5e4c0a85 >>>> I would really appreciate your feedback and thoughts on this. >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>> swift-evolution mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >>>> >>> -- >>> Javier Soto >> >> -- > Javier Soto
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
