+1 for being able to use cars.map(make)
> Am 16.12.2015 um 16:23 schrieb Al Skipp via swift-evolution > <[email protected]>: > >> On 16 Dec 2015, at 12:47, Sean Kosanovich via swift-evolution >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> As a Groovy user, I really enjoy the shorthand Spread Operator over the >> Collect Closure (Map is the equivalent in Swift). >> >> Consider the following Swift code: >> >> struct Car { >> let make: String >> let model: String >> } >> >> let cars = [Car(make: "Jeep", model: "Grand Cherokee"), Car(make: "Dodge", >> model: "Challenger")] >> let makes = cars.map() { $0.make } >> >> >> >> Now consider the same code using a Spread Operator: >> >> let makes = cars*.make > > I think there is a tension in Swift between its object oriented nature and > higher-order functions which leads to a lot of repetition of { $0.property } > > In this example: > cars.map { $0.make } > > I’d like to write the following, but ‘make’ is a member, not a free function: > cars.map(make) > > Is anyone else irked by the preponderance of { $0.property } in Swift (or is > it just me being grumpy)? Not sure what the solution would be, but I can’t > say I’m keen on the suggestion of: > > cars*.make > > It’s too mysterious. > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
