Le 28 déc. 2015 à 19:02, Kevin Ballard via swift-evolution <[email protected]> a écrit : > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015, at 03:53 PM, Michel Fortin via swift-evolution wrote: >> Following the new API guidelines, shouldn't the name be either >> `droppingFirst` or `excludingFirst`? That would solve your problem, right? >> Many things still need to be adapted to the new conventions. >> >> https://swift.org/documentation/api-design-guidelines.html#be-grammatical > > That's not what the conventions say. They say non-mutating phrases should > read as noun phrases when possible. But `droppingFirst` isn't a noun phrase. > This means things like `index.successor()`. It also says that if there is no > good noun phrase to use then imperative verbs are acceptable, which means it > will stay as `dropFirst`.
Really? The convention says: "When a mutating method is described by a verb, name its non-mutating counterpart according to the “ed/ing” rule, e.g. the non-mutating versions of x.sort() and x.append(y) are x.sorted() and x.appending(y)." Are you telling me that because no one bothered *yet* writing a mutating version of this method the "ing" rule does not apply? That it will apply only the day someone will write mutating method called `dropFirst`? This interpretation of the guidelines does not make much sense. -- Michel Fortin https://michelf.ca _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
