These are excellent.  I wouldn’t have chosen anything differently.

Thanks, Erica!

> On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:10 AM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> https://gist.github.com/erica/5a344b12bd989f6395c2 
> <https://gist.github.com/erica/5a344b12bd989f6395c2>
> 
> I think this one is pretty straightforward, but as always feedback is 
> requested and appreciated. 
> Let me know if you're okay with the names and the approach and whether there 
> are any technical
> barriers that need addressing.
> 
> Thanks, -- E
> 
> Introducing Build Configuration Tests for Platform Conditions
> 
> Proposal: SE-00XX
> Author(s): Erica Sadun <http://github.com/erica>
> Status: TBD
> Review manager: TBD
>  <https://gist.github.com/erica/5a344b12bd989f6395c2#introduction>Introduction
> 
> This proposal introduces configuration test to differentiate platform 
> conditions.
> 
> This proposal was discussed on-list in the Introducing Build Configuration 
> Tests for Platform Conditions 
> <applewebdata://16D657C7-581A-4F1A-9FCC-5C777E259D40>.
> 
>  <https://gist.github.com/erica/5a344b12bd989f6395c2#motivation>Motivation
> 
> Testing for platform conditions is a typical developer task. Although some 
> built-in features like CFByteOrderGetCurrentexist, it seems a natural match 
> to Swift to introduce build configurations specific to common platform 
> conditions.
> 
>  <https://gist.github.com/erica/5a344b12bd989f6395c2#detail-design>Detail 
> Design
> 
> This proposal adds the following build configuration tests:
> 
> #if endian(big)
> #if endian(little)
> #if bitwidth(32)
> #if bitwidth(64)
>  <https://gist.github.com/erica/5a344b12bd989f6395c2#current-art>Current Art
> 
> Swift currently supports the following configuration tests:
> 
> The literals true and false
> The os() function that tests for OSX, iOS, watchOS, tvOS, Linux, Windows, and 
> FreeBSD
> The arch() function that tests for x86_64, arm, arm64, i386, powerpc64, and 
> powerpc64le
> The swift() function that tests for specific Swift language releases, e.g. 
> swift(>=2.2)
>  
> <https://gist.github.com/erica/5a344b12bd989f6395c2#alternatives-considered>Alternatives
>  Considered
> 
> There are no alternatives considered.
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to