> On Mar 16, 2016, at 11:20 PM, Andrew Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Big +1 on this proposal from me. > > Does this proposal allow a protocol can have generic associated types? > associatedtype Something<T> > associatedtype Something<T: Hashable> > It's not mentioned, but I think it would be necessary at some point for > completeness.
This would fall under the "higher-kinded types" umbrella. -Joe
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
