+1

This is a great addition. I've hoped for it since 1.0.

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> • What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>
>
> +1
>
> • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to
> Swift?
>
>
> Yes
>
> • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
>
>
> Yes
>
> • If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature,
> how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>
>
> No
>
> • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading,
> or an in-depth study?
>
>
> Followed the initial thread and gave it a quick read.
>
>
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at:
>
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md
>
> Thank you,
>
> -Chris
> Review Manager
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution-announce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution-announce
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
>
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to