> Le 19 mars 2016 à 15:35, Dany St-Amant via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> a écrit : > > >> Le 15 mars 2016 à 09:07, Ilya Belenkiy via swift-evolution >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >> >> These names are very uniform, and the context is immediately clear, but they >> are very long. The 2 most commonly used (and spelled out) would be >> access(global) and access(scope), public and private are much shorter and >> are well established terms of art. > > An option which goes against Swift being as explicit as possible is to > support abbreviated scope, in addition to the full name: > > access(g) > access(m) > access(f) > access(s) >
Even knowing about what we are talking about, I got a hard time understanding what each option means. Using single letter name is utterly confusing and unreadable.
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
