> On Apr 6, 2016, at 11:10 AM, Dave Abrahams <dabrah...@apple.com> wrote:
> Again, I wasn't trying to suggest any of the solutions listed there.
> The point I was making was that we don't have enough information to
> design more than
>
> (0..<200).striding(by: -2)
I like this a lot but I assure you there will be some pushback about
readability of intent.
-- "Cassandra"
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
