> On 6 Apr 2016, at 19:48, Sean Heber <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This almost seems like it could work so that it didn't even need the
> bracketed parts to be able to figure out the types:
>
> func anyCommonElements(lhs: T, _ rhs: U) -> Bool where
> T : SequenceType,
> U : SequenceType,
> T.Generator.Element: Equatable,
> T.Generator.Element == U.Generator.Element
> {}
>
But if the brackets are kept, we may be able to do away with commas? For
example, this Standard Library function:
public func + <
C : RangeReplaceableCollectionType,
S : SequenceType
where S.Generator.Element == C.Generator.Element
> (lhs: C, rhs: S) -> C
would become:
public func + (lhs: C, rhs: S) -> C where <
C : RangeReplaceableCollectionType
C : SequenceType
S.Generator.Element == C.Generator.Element
>
Brackets may also be needed for the api view of the library.
milos
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
