> On Apr 9, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > I do think it is useful to be able to specify precedence relationships > without having to define a “group”, to avoid boilerplate when you have one > operator at a logical level (“??” for example).
Thought there is the obvious counterpoint: sugaring this one case doesn’t seem worthwhile, given how infrequently operators are defined. It is quite reasonable to start simple and always require an operator to be a member of a group. We could eliminate that boilerplate at some point down the road if it is an issue in practice. -Chris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
