> On Apr 16, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Patrick Gili via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > As an alternative, could we require the parens on the return. For example: > > (Int) -> (Float) > (String) -> () > () -> () > () -> (Double) > > This looks cleaner, improves consistency, and simplifies the syntax (i.e., no > need to remember when parens are necessary). > > -Patrick
I’m not sure it’s “cleaner” per se, but I agree with the rest. My earlier +1 may have been premature… - Dave Sweeris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
