Sorry for the delay, please mail me a copy next time :) Inline:
Антон Жилин: > > No new suggestions have come in 2 days, and so I have created a pull > request! > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pull/253 > 1. Assignment operators in Swift 2.2 have an `assignment` keyword: > infix operator += { > associativity right > precedence 90 > assignment > } > Right, it was planned to be removed anyway, and so I did not include it in the new syntax on purpose. Added removal of `assignment` to "details". 2. If assignments can't be chained, should they be non-associative? > Agreed, these operators are actually non-associative right now. Fixed that, thanks! > 3. Instead of `precedencegroup`, I suggest an abstract declaration: > operator Multiplicative { > associativity(left) > precedence(> Additive) > } > infix operator * : Multiplicative > Basically, change `precedencegroup` to `operator`? In terms of keywords, operator will be only a local keyword in my proposal, so I can say that each variant reserves one keyword. In terms of name itself, I think, `precedencegroup` is more to the point. Precedence groups are already mentioned in the standard. On the other hand, I agree that we should not introduce new entities when possible. Overall, I'm inclined to leave currently proposed syntax. > 4. In your proposal, `NilCoalesting` should be `NilCoalescing`. > -- Ben Fixed. - Anton
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
