Just wanted to go back to
Apply API Guidelines to the Standard Library SE-0006
https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0006-apply-api-guidelines-to-the-standard-library.md
for a second.
Just found out that this code is working in 3.0(mar 24):
var z1 = [3,2,1]
let z2 = z1.sort() // mutating method!
print(z2) // => ()
so.. is this a final implementation or we are expecting to have a lot of
hard-to-find errors in our Swift 3.0 code if code written for previous
Swift will be used(private lib/snippet/etc)?
Also, just interesting, are we all expecting libs like RxSwift and
ReacriveCocoa will rename their methods accordingly to names changed in
Swift 3.0?
On 19.04.2016 0:18, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution wrote:
Proposal
link:
https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0059-updated-set-apis.md
Hello Swift Community,
The review of SE-0059 "Update API Naming Guidelines and Rewrite Set APIs
Accordingly” ran from March 31...April 5, 2016. The proposal is *accepted*.
There was much debate, both before and during the review, over the
“InPlace” suffix/ “form” prefix, and at this point any answer will be
objectionable to some. The core team has opted to accept the proposal
as-is, keeping the “form” prefix to describe the mutating counterpart to an
operation naturally described by a noun (e.g., “formUnion” for the mutating
variant of “union”), for the reasons described in the proposal itself.
Thanks all for the spirited discussion!
- Doug
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
