> > > * What is your evaluation of the proposal? > +1. I believe "pass-through" functions such as autoreleasepool, withExtendedLifetime/withUnsafePointer, dispatch_sync, etc. should all have a generic-result/rethrowing signature.
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a > change to Swift? > Workarounds were doable, but clunky. > > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of > Swift? > Seems so. > > * If you have you used other languages or libraries with a > similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares > to those? > N/A > > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a > quick reading, or an in-depth study? > Quick reading of the proposal, because the implementation is very simple, and I've implemented similar utility functions before. Jacob
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
