> On Apr 25, 2016, at 15:16, Jordan Rose via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Apr 25, 2016, at 13:13, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> * I believe "near miss" is less important than "intentional override", >> requiring a signature of intent as in inheritance. > > This is a bit of a tangent, but as far as I know no one has objected to this. > It's just that no one has written up a proposal that includes retroactive > modeling.
"no one except Doug"
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
