> isLessThanOrEqual(to:) --> isLessThanOrEqualTo(_:). I'm still not totally > convinced that this is an improvement, so I'd love to hear further > suggestions on how to handle this case.
One possibility would be `isNoGreater(than:)`, which neatly sidesteps the problem. However, given the bizarreness of NaNs, you could argue whether it's actually accurate. (I would say it is, while `isNotGreater(than:)` would not be correct name, but admittedly that's a slight stretch.) I'll comment on the rest another time. -- Brent Royal-Gordon Architechies _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
