Am 27. April 2016 um 01:16 schrieb Dave Abrahams <[email protected]>: on Tue Apr 26 2016, Thorsten Seitz <tseitz42-AT-icloud.com> wrote: Am 26. April 2016 um 01:16 schrieb Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <[email protected]>: on Mon Apr 25 2016, Xiaodi Wu <xiaodi.wu-AT-gmail.com> wrote: Quick thought: Why are you reaching for the "form..." rule for the mutating methods when there are clear verb counterparts? location: locate successor: succeed We're not using successor(i) anymore, as noted below, and furthermore c.succeed(&i) strongly implies the wrong meaning. I didn't consider using c. locate(...:&i ... ) primarily because I never thought of it and nobody suggested it IIRC, but I also don't see how it would work in a family with c.location(after: i) et al. Suggestions? What is wrong with c.locate(after: i) ? Just to start with, it doesn't form a noun phrase. Ah, my bad, I had completely missed the point of the problem (somehow thinking in the old model, not realizing that `c` is the collection and `i` to be mutated instead of `c`). Yeah, in that case I totally agree :-) Sorry for the noise... -Thorsten
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
