> On Apr 28, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > We all know and love sizeof(), but given that it's different from its C > counterpart anyway, shouldn't these conform to Swift naming guidelines? In > other words, after SE-0006, shouldn't these names be as follows? > > ``` > size<T>(of: T.Type) > size<T>(ofValue: T) > stride<T>(of: T.Type) > stride<T>(ofValue: T) > align<T>(of: T.Type) > align<T>(ofValue: T) > ``` > > There are obvious issues with two different things named `stride`, but IMO > that's best addressed by renaming one of them; the real problem is that the > word stride is used in two different ways already. Thoughts?
Seems reasonable to me. -Joe _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
