Then why not rename stride(from:to:by:) to range(from:to:by:) ? I think, range is closer to what people coming from other languages expect to see.
- Anton > With the renaming proposed above, stride(of:) will appear to be related > to stride(from:to:by:). This conflict arises from a pre-existing issue; > namely, the term "stride" is used to mean two different things. Although > moving the preposition only highlights the issue, one possible resolution > is to rename strideof(_:) to strideSize(of:) and strideofValue(_:) > tostrideSize(ofValue:). > I wonder if it might make sense to rename all of these, then? > instanceSize(of:) > instanceSize(ofValue:) > alignmentSize(of:) > alignmentSize(ofValue:) > strideSize(of:) > strideSize(ofValue:) > -- > Brent Royal-Gordon > Architechies
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
