Yeah, I was just thinking that we should get the “call-site” syntax settled for property behaviors, for exactly that reason.
> On May 2, 2016, at 3:39 PM, Антон Жилин via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > One of proposals that will probably be submitted for Swift 4, will be > Property Behaviors propoal. > > It aims to generalize @IBOutlet, @synchronized, @delayedinit, and of course, > @lazy. > (Side note: it would be great if it also included unowned) > > Because we aim for less breaking changes in Swift 4, we should prepare ground > for it. > The suggestion is to rename `lazy` to `@lazy`. > > Besides the aforementioned reason, I think, lazy really has its place among > attributes. > It does not change type of property, it just helps to delay side effects of > initialization. > > - Anton > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
