Tony, With regard to this proposal, is there any reason that this proposal did not include an OrderedSet value type? I suspect perhaps this is an oversight?
- Rod > On 4 May 2016, at 1:50 PM, Rod Brown via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I believe this would fall in line with by Proposal SE-0069: Mutability and > Foundation Value Types: > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0069-swift-mutability-for-foundation.md > > <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0069-swift-mutability-for-foundation.md> > > I notice there is no OrderedSet in this proposal. I find it odd that it > doesn’t yet include it. > > - Rod > > > >> On 4 May 2016, at 1:24 PM, Nicholas Maccharoli via swift-evolution >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hello Swift Community, >> >> Recently I have noticed that there is a Set type but no OrderedSet type yet. >> If I want a set that preserves the original order I have to go with >> NSOrderedSet >> but I think it would be nice to have a native implementation in the standard >> library. >> >> What are your thoughts on this? >> >> Thanks! >> >> - Nick >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
