> On May 5, 2016, at 10:03, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 5, 2016, at 8:59 AM, Alex Hoppen via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Say you have the function `foo() -> Int`. Then `foo()` calls `foo` and >> returns its return value of type `Int` – not a reference to the function of >> type `Void -> Int`. > > Right. > > That said, what is wrong with just “foo”?
As pointed out in the original post, that can refer to both ‘foo()’ and ‘foo(bar:)’ today. Jordan _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
