> On May 5, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Max Moiseev <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Matthew, > > In general, if you think there is something to be updated in the proposal, it > is worth creating a new revision (like in the floating point protocols > proposal, for example) and mentioning it in the thread. > > I think it is a way to go in this particular case, since we are still in the > first half of the review period. Any further discussion would benefit from it.
t made the change and submitted a PR. > > max > > >> On May 5, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Matthew Johnson <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On May 5, 2016, at 5:19 PM, Max Moiseev via swift-evolution >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This email is the result of a discussion between members of the standard >>> library team. >>> >>> We suggest changing the initializers argument label to `exactly` to match >>> the one used in the floating point protocols proposal >>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0067-floating-point-protocols.md>. >>> Other than that the proposal seems to be a valuable addition to the >>> standard library. >> >> Thanks Max. I'm glad to hear that! Should I update the proposal or will >> you just make that change as part of "accepted with modification"? >> >>> >>> max >>> >>>> On May 3, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Chris Lattner <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Swift community, >>>> >>>> The review of "SE-0080: Failable Numeric Conversion Initializers" begins >>>> now and runs through May 9. The proposal is available here: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0080-failable-numeric-initializers.md >>>> >>>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0080-failable-numeric-initializers.md> >>>> >>>> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews >>>> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at >>>> >>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution> >>>> >>>> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the >>>> review manager. >>>> >>>> What goes into a review? >>>> >>>> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review >>>> through constructive criticism and contribute to the direction of Swift. >>>> When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer >>>> in your review: >>>> >>>> * What is your evaluation of the proposal? >>>> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change >>>> to Swift? >>>> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? >>>> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, >>>> how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? >>>> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick >>>> reading, or an in-depth study? >>>> >>>> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md >>>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md> >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> >>>> -Chris Lattner >>>> Review Manager >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> swift-evolution-announce mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution-announce >>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution-announce> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> swift-evolution mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution> >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
