Actually a setter has more in common with a function, in which case the let 
implicit, the difference is that a setters type is also implicit. In fact, you 
don’t even need to specify a name in a setter at all, as the default is 
newValue and you can just use that.

I’m more curious whether we even need a named new value at all, or if setters 
should just look like the following instead:

        set { sideLength = $0 / 4.0 }

As this would be more consistent with anonymous closure arguments, rather than 
using newValue which is arbitrary. I’ve never encountered an occasion where 
I’ve needed a custom name, and I only use external vs internal names on 
functions where I can make an external name that flows better, but perhaps 
doesn’t mesh with my other internal variable names.

> On 6 May 2016, at 12:09, Ian Partridge via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Currently, the syntax for explicitly naming property setters is:
> 
> class Square {
>   var sideLength: Double = 0.0
> 
>   var perimeter: Double {
>     get {
>       return sideLength * 4.0
>     }
>     set(newPerimeter) { // declares newPerimeter parameter, "let" not allowed
>       sideLength = newPerimeter / 4.0
>     }
>   }
> }
> 
> Compare this with how extraction of associated values from enumerations looks:
> 
> enum ServerResponse {
>   case Failure(String)
>   case Result(Int)
> }
> let response = ServerResponse.Result(404)
> 
> switch response {
> case .Failure(let reason): // let is required here
>   print(reason)
> case .Result(let code):
>   print(code)
> }
> 
> For consistency, would it be better to allow/require:
> 
> class Square {
>   var sideLength: Double = 0.0
> 
>   var perimeter: Double {
>     get {
>       return sideLength * 4.0
>     }
>     set(let newPerimeter) {  // declares newPerimeter parameter
>         sideLength = newPerimeter / 4.0
>     }
>   }
> }
> 
> The idea would apply to didSet{} and willSet{} too.
> 
> -- 
> Ian Partridge
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to