> On 09 May 2016, at 00:38, Austin Zheng <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Is the plan to eventually support "multiple" forms of concrete same-type
> requirement syntax - the existing "where Element == SomeConcreteType" and the
> generic parameterized extensions described elsewhere? If not, the syntax
> should probably be discussed as part of a pre-proposal thread before anything
> else happens.
The way modifications have gone through swift-evolution, it seems like it would
be more logical to implement it with no syntax change first and only then
propose and discuss generic parameterised extensions.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
