> On 10 May 2016, at 17:38, Rick Ballard via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Question for those of you who are advocating for a "spm" alias: Do you have a > strong argument / preference for "spm" vs "swiftpm"? Personally I have been > abbreviating the project as "swiftpm" and not "spm" when I talk about it, and > have been trying to push that as the preferred abbreviation. "spm" is a few > less keystrokes, but is a much more generic, less googleable name; out of > context, it's impossible to know what it refers to. Once the project gets > enough mindshare, like "npm" has, that might be less of an issue, but I still > personally prefer the more descriptive "swiftpm". Thoughts? > > - Rick
Either works for me to be honest. `swiftpm` works just as well for me as `spm` Regards, Rob... _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
