I like those a lot. Crystal clear. > On 11 May 2016, at 05:14, Patrick Smith via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > How about: > > Consuming (from) > Producing (to) > > > IntegerLiteralConsuming > StringLiteralConsuming > > CustomStringProducing > CustomDebugStringProducing > > > As for something that does both, all I could find was ‘bidirectional’, > ‘two-way’, ‘mutual’, ‘duplex’. I tried searching in biology > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_reaction), but couldn’t find anything. > I like the idea of just conforming to both protocols, and some sort of > protocol typealias. Or staying with Representable. > > >>> On 11 May 2016, at 12:33 PM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On May 10, 2016, at 6:51 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On May 10, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Chris Lattner <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Swift community, >>>> >>>> The review of "SE-0041: Updating Protocol Naming Conventions for >>>> Conversions" begins now and runs through May 16. The proposal is available >>>> here: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0041-conversion-protocol-conventions.md >>> >>> Here are comments from someone who preferred to stay anonymous. These are >>> not my own: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> * What is your evaluation of the proposal? >>> >>> I rather agree with the comments mentioned in the proposal from the >>> Standard Library design team, in that I agree with the basic intention of >>> the proposal, but I’m not convinced about the proposed answer. Specifically: >> >> >> We'd be happy to bikeshed again. >> >> I think fundamentally our take on this is: >> >> * We want there to be a standard that expresses the three >> conversion/initialization styles. >> * We feel the system is currently broken. And we want to have a coherent and >> settled vision in place for 3, even imperfect. >> * We're flexible about the naming but it should be (1) Swifty and (2) well >> grounded in meaning. >> >> Let me turn the floor over to Matthew here. >> >> -- E >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
