> My main piece of feedback is that the method names synchronously() and
> asynchronously() don’t conform to Swift 3 naming conventions for functions
> and methods:
I agree.
> dispatchAsynch()
> dispatchSynch()
I prefer something like this. It feels more Swifty. As it is, they aren't any
longer than asynchronously(), if name length is a concern.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
