If there is a method with such name in Range(with equal meaning) - then it
seems like `clamping` will be the best solution here.
(as non-native speaker I don't feel this word is often used especially in
software development, but.. it seems like anyone who is writing in Swift
must be strong native English speaker/writer :-P I also mean all these
naming conversions, verb/noun, -ing/-ed/-able etc ;-) )
On 12.05.2016 12:56, Luis Henrique B. Sousa wrote:
Yes, it would really be more consistent. "within" sounds great to me as
well, but I don't know if there is a naming convention for it.
I am okay to change our proposal to have those labels as two verbs -
instead of a preposition and a verb - as suggested by @Brent.
More opinions?
- Luis
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Brent Royal-Gordon <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> It sounds good, thanks for you suggestions @Vladimir, @Patrick and @Brent.
>
> I've just updated the proposal:
>
https://github.com/luish/swift-evolution/blob/more-lenient-subscripts/proposals/nnnn-more-lenient-collections-subscripts.md#detailed-design
>
> - Luis
Hmm. If you're going with `checking` for one of them, perhaps the other
should be `clamping` (for the analogous method on `Range`, which you
might want to use in the implementation of that subscript). That would
create a nicely matched pair:
array[checking: 0..<10]
array[clamping: 0..<10]
--
Brent Royal-Gordon
Architechies
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
