I do it quite a lot, especially for initialising structs, enums. I use it to 
get the same benefits as a switch statement spread over several lines.

I think it’s often good to liberally apply new lines, as it aids legibility.

Here some sample code of mine using it:

extension ImageGraphic : JSONObjectRepresentable {
        public init(source: JSONObjectDecoder) throws {
                try self.init(
                        imageSource: source.decode("imageSource"),
                        width: source.decodeOptional("width"),
                        height: source.decodeOptional("height")
                )
        }
        
        public func toJSON() -> JSON {
                return .ObjectValue([
                        "imageSource": imageSource.toJSON(),
                        "width": width.toJSON(),
                        "height": height.toJSON()
                ])
        }
}


> On 13 May 2016, at 3:01 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On May 12, 2016, at 4:50 PM, Joe Groff <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>    --- a.swift
>>>>    +++ a.swift
>>>>     foo(
>>>>       x: 0,
>>>>    -  y: 1
>>>>    +  y: 1,
>>>>    +  z: 2
>>>>     )
>>>> 
>>>> Trailing commas avoid this:
>>>> 
>>>>    --- a.swift
>>>>    +++ a.swift
>>>>     foo(
>>>>       x: 0,
>>>>       y: 1,
>>>>    +  z: 2,
>>>>     )
>>> 
>>> You’re arguing that you want to read Swift code written like this?
>> 
>> I wouldn't mind it.
> 
> I personally find that style repulsive :-) and I haven’t seen swift code 
> commonly doing it.  I’m not sure that we want to encourage it either.
> 
>> The standard library already uses this style for function parameters, modulo 
>> the trailing comma, and I certainly prefer it to:
>>      
>>>     --- a.swift
>>>     +++ a.swift
>>>      foo( x: 0
>>>         , y: 1
>>>     +   , z: 2
>>>         )
> 
> I agree that this is even worse, but I also haven’t seen this used in Swift 
> code.  Have you?   Swift’s strictness with argument labels makes any of this 
> pretty unappealing to use.
> 
> If we were really concerned about this, a narrower way to solve the same 
> problem would be to allow a comma before the ), but *only* when there is a 
> newline between them.  I still don’t see why we’d want to encourage this 
> though.
> 
> -Chris
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to