A case can be made, of course. My personal opinion is that I don't want to see it in the language at any point. Others are free to agree or disagree.
Austin > On May 17, 2016, at 9:21 AM, Matthew Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On May 17, 2016, at 11:18 AM, Austin Zheng <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> If people really want to pursue further sugar here I think it would be >>> worthwhile to explore a direction that hasn’t already been debated >>> extensively. That is why I suggested thinking about `if unwrap`. That >>> said, I really don’t think current state is too bad. It’s definitely not >>> worth expending community energy on this when we clearly have more >>> important things to focus on (like completing generics and ABI). >>> >> >> >> I agree with Matthew. A marginal increase in developer convenience is, to >> me, not worth the additional complexity of special purpose syntax. > > I think it’s fair to make a case for the special purpose syntax (which may or > may not be accepted). I just don’t think now is the right time to have a > debate about it. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
