> didSet and willSet remain outliers in the general rule of conjoined lowercase > keywords. Is there any support for bringing these outliers into the fold? I would rather like to see them disappear completely — although those "decorators" [is there any established term to describe them?] can be quite handy, they add a lot of special syntax to the language... _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
Re: [swift-evolution] RFC: didset and willset
Tino Heth via swift-evolution Wed, 18 May 2016 13:00:27 -0700
- [swift-evolution] RFC: didset and wi... Erica Sadun via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] RFC: dids... Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] RFC: dids... Patrick Smith via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] RFC: dids... Tino Heth via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] RFC: ... Tino Heth via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] R... Krystof Vasa via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] RFC: dids... Michael Peternell via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] RFC: ... Sean Heber via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] R... Erica Sadun via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolutio... Krystof Vasa via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evo... Josh Parmenter via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift... Michael Peternell via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evo... Erica Sadun via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift... Ricardo Parada via swift-evolution
