> Hello Swift community,
>
> The review of "SE-0077: Improved operator declarations" begins now and runs 
> through May 23. The proposal is available here:
>
>         
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0077-operator-precedence.md
>
>         * What is your evaluation of the proposal?

I didn't follow much of the thread for this but from the description
of the proposal I can see how it adds clarity and understanding to
code. I really cannot tell the precedence of an operator I declared in
certain expressions because those precedence number don't make much
sense. The idea of describing the precedence of the operator compared
to other groups of operators seems to add a lot more of understanding
to my code. Just forgive me if I didn't see this but I expect that I
cannot declare an operator belonging to more than one group or compare
to more than one group for precedence (thou I see some situations
being able to asset precedence against more than one group could be
useful).

>         * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a 
> change to Swift?

Yes.

>         * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?

Yes.

>         * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar 
> feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?

C# allowed for operator overloading but not declaring new operators
thus all precedence was already defined by the language.

>         * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick 
> reading, or an in-depth study?

A quick reading.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to