> Hello Swift community, > > The review of "SE-0091: Improving operator requirements in protocols" begins > now and runs through May 23. The proposal is available here: > > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0091-improving-operators-in-protocols.md > > * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
Allow for consistent code when implementing operators. I'd go a bit further and say any operator functions should be declared like this but this seems to be the case for another proposal. > * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a > change to Swift? Yes. > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? Yes. > * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar > feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? Yes. In C# operator overloading is done exactly like this (but also only like this). > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? A quick reading. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
