Oh, in this case IMO warning for 'self.' will never be introduced, it's
clear. And as I understand, no support in community for warning for
shadowing. OK, so as I understand, the only solution here - tools like
SwiftLint and plugins to xcode.
Btw, regarding 'similar to the override keyword', do you mean something
like this:
class A {
public var x = 10
func f() {
override var x = 100
var value: Int? = 1
if override let value = value {..}
}
}
?
On 19.05.2016 20:58, David Waite wrote:
I believe the Swift Team has previously stated they do not want opt-in
warnings defining alternate swift ‘grammars’. I don’t believe there are
any existing -W flags for the compiler, for instance.
If there is shadowing warning added, I’m of the opinion it should work
similar to the override keyword.
-DW
On May 19, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Vladimir.S via swift-evolution
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 18.05.2016 22:43, Krystof Vasa wrote:
I agree that shadowing variables is not a good idea, but I stand by
my point that it's potentially dangerous and error-prone to allow
accessing instance variables without `self`.
Could we all agree that we need these options: 1. option to turn on
warnings on accessing instance variables without `self` 2. option to
turn on warnings on shadowing And that by default, none of that
options should be enabled. ?
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution
mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
