> > * What is your evaluation of the proposal? +1. These functions are really handy. The standard library should definitely include commonly useful utilities like these.
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a > change to Swift? Yes. It’s best to have these in the standard library rather than all creating our own versions. > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? Yes. > * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar > feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? I like that this proposal modifies the signature of `sequence(state:next:) to use `inout`. The ability to do this is an advantage Swift has over functional languages. > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? Quick reading, but also followed the discussions and the prior review. > > More information about the Swift evolution process is available at > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md > <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md> > > Thank you, > > -Chris Lattner > Review Manager > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution> > > > > -- > Trent Nadeau > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
