On May 19, 2016, at 10:26 PM, Dan Appel <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, I am in full support then. Thanks for being patient here!
No problem at all, thanks! -Chris > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:23 PM Chris Lattner <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On May 19, 2016, at 10:17 PM, Dan Appel <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >Because it means that there is exactly one API: not a canonical API and a > > >similar-but-different and less efficient wrapper. > > > > Fair enough. > > > > >The approach taken here generalizes to other (similarly structured) C APIs > > >as well. > > > > I don't see any mention of this in the proposal. Is this related to the > > other C api translation proposal? > > Yes, this is basically a “review libdispatch’s adoption of SE-0044 and other > recent features” proposal. > > > >Why not do it? > > > > Well, I want "equal opportunity" for all libraries. > > I agree. > > -Chris > > -- > Dan Appel
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
