Isn’t `Any` a typealias for `any<>`? If so, we have to support `any<>`! :) Yes it is and SE-0095 will cause that all types implicitly conform to empty any<>.
This still can be banned from any<any<>, A> because its useless and redundant. But is up to the core team to decide. -- Adrian Zubarev Sent with Airmail
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
