If accessors are defined by the developer who designs a property behavior then I do not see them as keywords. Or am I wrong?
That is why I would prefer them lowerCamelCase. On May 20, 2016, at 1:50 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thus, `willSet` and `didSet` should be capitalized like other, user-defined, >> accessors. > > I agree with your believe that we should treat these just like user-defined > accessors. So lets assume we had an “observed” behavior that had > didset/willset aspects that can be specified. To the implementor of the > behavior, these are terms that they define, but to users of the behavior, > they are indistinguishable from keywords. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
