>A value-value map is just simpler and cleaner, while almost always giving you what you need. +1
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:59 PM Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote: > > I have a small remark though, wouldn’t it be better to let transform be > of type (Key, Value) throws -> T instead of (Value) throws -> T? You can > just ignore the key (with _) if you don’t need it, but I think it might > come in handy in some cases. > > The problem is, that closes the door to writing many simple maps in > functional style. For instance, this: > > dictionaryOfNumbers.mapValues(abs) > > Would have to become this: > > dictionaryOfNumbers.mapValues { _, v in abs(v) } > > (It *might* be possible to do it with `$1`, but I'm not sure; there are > some limitations around that.) > > A value-value map is just simpler and cleaner, while almost always giving > you what you need. > > -- > Brent Royal-Gordon > Architechies > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > -- Dan Appel
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
