Great news! I've filed a bug for this in JIRA: https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1622
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote: > Proposal Link: > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0094-sequence-function.md > > The review of "SE-0094: Add sequence(initial:next:) and > sequence(state:next:) to the stdlib" ran from May 19…23, 2016. The proposal > has been *accepted* with one minor naming-related change: > > - Feedback from the community & core team is positive. > - Core team discussed whether it made sense to add just the first form, or > whether it made sense to add both. They agree that although the form using > an explicit state is much more infrequently used, when it is necessary, it > is extremely helpful to have. It is also useful to consider both as a pair. > - On naming, the core team agrees with the community that > “sequence(first:next:)” is a better name than "sequence(initial:next:)”. > "sequence(state:next:)” is approved as-is. > > Thank you to Kevin Ballard and Erica Sadun for proposing this both in > SE-0045 and in SE-0094, an implementation of these functions would be > welcome! > > -Chris Lattner > Review Manager > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
