On May 27, 2016, at 13:57, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The idea is simple:
>
> • Can we make return keyword optional in cases like this?
> • Shouldn’t this behave like @autoclosure or @noescape?
> type A {
> var characters: [Character] = …
> var string: String { String(self.characters) }
> var count: Int { 42 }
> }
>
> Is this worth a proposal or Swifty enough, what do you think?
>
> Sure I could write return, but why do we allow this behavior for @noescape
> functions like map!?
While I am not necessarily against this idea, I do wonder if it’s worth making
what’s going on here less obvious simply for the sake of being able to omit a
six character keyword. As I understand it, one of the reasons ++/-- were
removed was due to the increased "burden to learn Swift as a first programming
language.” This is the sort of thing that becomes another one of those special
cases that has to be explained to someone new to Swift.
/brian
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
