> On May 27, 2016, at 9:36 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> https://github.com/austinzheng/swift-evolution/blob/az-edit-89/proposals/0089-rename-string-reflection-init.md
>
> I prefer the more conservative and backwards-compatible option of using
> `description` and conforming `ValuePreservingStringConvertible` to
> `CustomStringConvertible`.
>
> This is for three reasons:
+1 to all of your points.
> ("Lossless" instead of "ValuePreserving" is fine too, perhaps even slightly
> better.)
I agree, even though Lossless seems less specific, it does seem like it would
feel more comfortable sitting next to “Custom”.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
