David, I personally see all 3 of your copies of proposal in list ;-)
+1 from me for this proposal. It removes inconsistency and removes
unexpected behavior. Known that static stored property is lazy(I'd like to
require `lazy` keyword for static stored properties to highlight that
fact), I believe no one really expects that it will be evaluated on
assignment. Current behavior looks like a bug for me.
On 31.05.2016 16:32, David Rönnqvist wrote:
With the risk of this showing up 3 times in the mailing list (I posted it
as a new topic, but it didn't seem to show up).
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
