> On Jun 1, 2016, at 11:10 PM, Xiaodi Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Jacob Bandes-Storch <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > If it's worth continuing the discussion in this thread, I rather like the > MemoryLayout<T>.size idea. For discoverability, we might want to have > @availability(*, unavailable, message: "use MemoryLayout<T>.size, etc.") > public init(){}. > > It's a nice syntax, but I'm not fully comfortable with the suggestion that > sizeofValue(), etc. should go. Also, I wonder about the static vs. dynamic > type issue here (despite having started the last thread, I still haven't sat > down to think it through). >
Updated with all the feedback so far. Will keep an eye on this. -- E
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
