> On Jun 1, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Austin Zheng <[email protected]> wrote: > > This was indeed a very thorough review by the core team. I'll prepare a v2 > proposal with this feedback taken into account so we can continue moving > things along. > > One quick question - is making whatever syntax is chosen for Swift 3 > "forward-compatible" with a future generalized existential feature a concern?
Yes it is a concern, but we assume that the “X & Y” syntax will always be accepted going forward, as sugar for the more general feature that is yet to be designed. -Chris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
